Oscar De La Hoya recently criticized Canelo Alvarez for choosing to fight Jaime Munguia instead of David Benavidez. However, De La Hoya’s anger seems misplaced considering that Canelo’s decision not only benefited Munguia but also Golden Boy Promotions.
De La Hoya’s verbal backhand towards Canelo for choosing Munguia over Benavidez may have been unwarranted. Instead of being grateful for the opportunity given to Munguia, he chose to criticize Canelo for not fighting the opponent of his choice.
There seems to be a concern from De La Hoya about a potential fight between Canelo and Benavidez. However, looking at Benavidez’s record, it is evident that he has not faced any significant opposition to warrant a fight against the likes of Canelo. His wins have come against fighters who are either past their prime or not considered top contenders in the division.
While De La Hoya’s criticism towards Canelo may have stemmed from a desire to see his fighter face top competition, it is important to acknowledge the generosity shown by Canelo in giving Munguia an opportunity to showcase his skills on a big stage. Instead of expressing gratitude for this opportunity, De La Hoya’s comments came off as ungrateful and dismissive of Canelo’s gesture.
In the world of boxing, matchups are often made based on a variety of factors – including business considerations, skill levels, and potential fan interest. While De La Hoya may have wanted to see Benavidez face Canelo for competitive reasons, it is essential to understand the complexities involved in making these decisions. Ultimately, Canelo’s choice to fight Munguia should be viewed as a strategic move that benefitted all parties involved.
While tensions may have arisen between De La Hoya and Canelo over the choice of opponents in a recent fight, it is important to consider the broader context of such decisions in the world of boxing. Gratitude, respect, and understanding should be key elements in assessing the motivations behind these choices, rather than criticism and animosity.