The aftermath of the fight between Israil Madrimov and Terence Crawford left a bitter taste in the mouths of many, with promoter Eddie Hearn being the most vocal critic of the judges’ decision. Hearn expressed his disbelief at the outcome of the fight, stating that Crawford did not do enough to deserve the victory. According to Hearn, to beat a world champion, one must showcase a level of dominance that Crawford failed to display against Madrimov.
Fans on social media joined Hearn in his criticism of the decision, with many believing that Madrimov outperformed Crawford in the ring. They argued that Crawford, once a formidable force in the boxing world, appeared to be a shadow of his former self against Madrimov. The sentiment was that Crawford lacked the same level of skill and agility that he had exhibited in previous fights, leading to questions about his current standing in the sport.
Madrimov’s Perspective
Israil Madrimov himself expressed disappointment in the judges’ decision, stating that he felt he should have won the fight. Madrimov even went as far as to call out His Excellency Turki Alalshikh, urging him to organize a rematch against Crawford. However, both Turki and Crawford seemed to have their sights set on a potential showdown with Canelo Alvarez in the near future, indicating that a rematch with Madrimov may not be in the cards.
Crawford’s Performance
The fight highlighted an apparent shift in Crawford’s abilities, particularly at the 154 weight class. While Crawford had previously dominated in lower weight divisions, he struggled to assert his dominance in the fight against Madrimov. This left many questioning whether Crawford would be able to maintain his winning streak against tougher opponents in the division.
Despite the controversy surrounding the decision, Team Crawford seemed more focused on securing lucrative opportunities, such as a potential fight against Canelo Alvarez. The fact that they were aware of the closeness of the fight against Madrimov, but still prioritized financial gains over a rematch, raised eyebrows among fans and critics alike.
Final Thoughts
The fight between Madrimov and Crawford shed light on the subjective nature of judging in boxing and the influence of financial incentives in the sport. While fans and analysts may continue to debate the outcome of the fight, one thing remains clear – the sport of boxing is as unpredictable and contentious as ever.