The Downside of WBC’s ‘Tamaulipas II’ Belt and the Canelo Alvarez vs. Edgar Berlanga Fight

The creation of yet another special commemorative belt by WBC president Mauricio Sulaiman for the upcoming Canelo Alvarez vs. Edgar Berlanga fight has raised eyebrows in the boxing world. With an already saturated market of belts in different weight divisions, the introduction of a new belt only adds to the confusion for both hardcore fans and casual spectators. The proliferation of belts across various organizations only serves to dilute the significance of each title, making it hard for fans to keep track of who the legitimate champions are.

Many fans speculate that the WBC’s decision to introduce the ‘Tamaulipas II’ belt is merely a publicity stunt to garner more attention to the organization. By presenting the belt to the winner of the fight, which is expected to be Canelo Alvarez, the WBC hopes to capitalize on the exposure and media coverage surrounding the event. However, critics argue that this move is unnecessary and only serves to further muddy the waters in an already convoluted boxing landscape.

In addition to the controversy surrounding the new belt, there are also concerns about the matchmaking for the Canelo Alvarez vs. Edgar Berlanga fight. Many boxing enthusiasts believe that Berlanga is not a credible opponent for Canelo at this stage in his career, as he has yet to face top-tier competition to prove himself. Furthermore, the high price of the pay-per-view (PPV) event, set at $90, has raised eyebrows among fans who feel that the matchup does not justify the steep cost. With other promotions like Riyadh Season offering lower prices for their events, the Canelo vs. Berlanga fight stands out as an expensive and potentially lopsided affair.

The introduction of the ‘Tamaulipas II’ belt and the matchmaking for the Canelo Alvarez vs. Edgar Berlanga fight reflect some of the ongoing issues within the world of boxing. From the proliferation of belts to questionable matchmaking decisions and high PPV prices, fans and analysts alike are skeptical about the direction of the sport. As the fight approaches, it remains to be seen how the boxing community will react to these developments and whether they will have a lasting impact on the future of the sport.

Boxing

Articles You May Like

Gervonta Davis vs. Lamont Roach: Anticipating the Upcoming Showdown
The Saga of Real Boxers vs. Social Media Sensations
Joshua Clottey: The Return of a Boxing Legend
The Crucial Road Ahead for Israil Madrimov: A Test of Skill and Resilience

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *