The ongoing feud between Oscar De La Hoya and Canelo Alvarez seems to have taken a new turn with De La Hoya’s recent comments on a podcast. Instead of burying the hatchet, De La Hoya has decided to stir the pot even more by calling out Canelo for allegedly ducking David Benavidez. This has only added fuel to the fire in an already strained relationship.
The Fight Selection Controversy
De La Hoya’s criticism of Canelo’s choice to fight Edgar Berlanga instead of Benavidez has sparked controversy among fans and the boxing community. While some may see Berlanga as an easy choice for Canelo, others argue that he deserves to pick his opponents based on his own career trajectory. This debate raises questions about the expectations placed on fighters and the pressure to always take on the toughest challengers.
De La Hoya’s prediction of a potential box office flop for the Canelo-Berlanga fight, especially in comparison to a big UFC event on the same night, adds an interesting twist to the narrative. This raises concerns about the commercial viability of the fight and whether Canelo’s star power is enough to draw in viewers against tough competition.
Fan Boycotts and Fighter Autonomy
The question of whether fans will boycott Canelo for his fight choices and whether Canelo himself would even care speaks to the larger issue of fighter autonomy. Canelo’s status as a future Hall of Famer and his financial success give him the power to dictate his career path. This raises questions about the role of fan expectations and how much influence they should have on a fighter’s decisions.
As the feud between De La Hoya and Canelo continues to escalate, it remains to be seen how this will impact the boxing world. Whether fans will rally behind Canelo or turn against him based on his fight choices will shape his legacy in the sport. Ultimately, the outcome of the Canelo-Berlanga fight and the fan response to it will determine the next chapter in this ongoing saga.