There has been talk of a potential double-header featuring Errol Spence vs. Sebastian Fundora and Manny Pacquiao vs. Mario Barrios in December. Both matchups are raising eyebrows due to the questionable choice of opponents for both Spence and Pacquiao.
Spence and Pacquiao are considered to be ring-worn at this point in their careers, making them less than ideal candidates to be challenging for world titles. Both fighters have shown signs of wear and tear in recent performances, raising concerns about their ability to compete at the highest level.
The potential matchups have sparked controversy, with many questioning the validity of Pacquiao challenging Barrios for the WBC welterweight title. Pacquiao, who is 45 years old and has been inactive for three years, has not earned a title shot against Barrios, who is considered the weakest link among the welterweight champions.
Deserved Opportunities
Critics argue that Pacquiao should have to prove himself against top contenders in the WBC rankings before being granted a title shot. Similarly, Spence, who has not fought since his loss to Terence Crawford, would benefit from a tune-up fight before facing a tough opponent like Fundora.
The matchups, while intriguing from a fan perspective, are not necessarily in the best interest of the fighters involved. Both Spence and Pacquiao would be facing significant challenges without the benefit of proper preparation or ideal circumstances.
The potential double-header featuring Errol Spence vs. Sebastian Fundora and Manny Pacquiao vs. Mario Barrios raises serious questions about the matchmaking decisions being made in boxing. While the fights may generate interest and revenue, they do not necessarily provide the best opportunities for the fighters involved.